We raised $143M to build the control layer for software change.Read more: We raised $143M to build the control layer for software change.
Your org standards. Enforced on every PR, across every team.
Book a demoAI coding tools add up to 41% more bugs. Find them before they cost you millions.
The feedback I get from developers is that they like that it shows them typo errors, null pointers, and static code. It's a good tool to get these edge scenarios.
Seref Boyer, Chief ArchitectFree your devs from endless reviews so they have time to ship features that move the needle.
My code review time is down around 30%. When I see useful comments, I don’t focus on those areas. I cover other areas and rely on CodeRabbit.
Kyrylo Buha
, Technical StaffThe AI who created the bug is unlikely to fix it. But we will.
Devs use different code gen tools – CodeRabbit is a standard quality gate.
Our reviews actually understand your codebase and find much more.
Return to rigorous code quality.
Since adopting CodeRabbit, our confidence is up and our bugs are down; it catches the edge cases humans skim past and helps us merge faster with more confidence.
CodeRabbit provided a consistent enforcement layer both for AI-generated code and for engineers still writing code manually.
Before CodeRabbit, quality depended on who reviewed your PR. Now the bar is the same for everyone.
Writing code faster was never the issue; the bottleneck was always code review. I feel like CodeRabbit is solving that one problem and that was attractive. Why not solve that problem before we use a coding agent?
Ready for a demo?Let's chat!
